"I base everything that I do on Syncrometer testing."

I don't want anybody saying: "I believe in your system." I don't want belief because it isn't part of the system. Either a system works or it doesn't, and we don't need faith in it. There are quite a few adversarial parties out there - mostly professional people - who feel this is a piece of junk, never having built it or used it, and who say that it couldn't work, therefore it doesn't. I believe that if they could see for themselves the demonstration that I'm going to show you today, it would stop those adversarial comments. So, I'm going to demonstrate what this new technology can do. I call it a Syncrometer and I give the circuit for it and all the instructions for building it in my books because I would like one in every home. That has to be a bit in the future - it has to become more automated before that can happen. But, I would like to see all the people who are a little bit inclined toward technology, and even those who never were, but now would be interested, to learn this technique because it can do some very important things.

Now, you know that the most popular test instrument - the most common one - technically speaking, is a voltmeter. It's just a little box with circuitry in it that has two wires coming out of it and if you put them on two places, including on your body, it's going to measure the voltage between those two places, or the current, or the resistance. Now, the Syncrometer is another test instrument, but it doesn't measure the voltage, current or resistance. If you put the Syncrometer's two leads on you, you can detect something that's deep inside your body. You can detect something that's in your muscles, bone or bone marrow specifically. It doesn't matter what the entity is. It doesn't have to be some electrical item. It can be a biological item. It can be a bacterium, virus, or parasite. It can be natural things like your metabolites, the sugar that you ate, or the other things that you ate that we won't mention. It can detect most anything that you can think of; elements, metals - any compound at all. So that is a very powerful kind of test instrument. It is based on a transistor, one transistor, so you know it's quite sophisticated, even though somebody has called it, I think, a handful of junk.

Of course, a transistor is not very large - it does fit in your hand. The Syncrometer has one PNP transistor attached to an audio oscillator, so it's a transistor-oscillator. That device, placed on you, can identify anything that's in you! That's very powerful. And, I think that those persons, especially professional people, who have been a little too quick in judging it, would like to see this demonstration themselves. I'm sure they're really, at heart, pretty much the scientist and open minded - it's just that this was too much to believe.

I plan to talk about cancer therapy and how we do it in Tijuana. There are many other clinics that do it differently, but I base everything that I do on Syncrometer testing. And everything in my books, where I make statements, is based on Syncrometer testing. So, it is important to know a little bit about it.

"There's a glitch or a hole between NIH and the Oncologist's desk."

You've probably thought that if this method is so good, then why doesn't it get validated or somehow tested clinically so that it can become acceptable therapy? I used to think that way too, until I read a book by Ralph Moss. He wrote a book on cancer therapies, Ralph Moss's Cancer Therapy, and in it you'll find about 100, which is not at all exhaustive, cancer therapies. Not just cancer therapies that were discovered by somebody, but those that have been validated by NIH, The National Institutes of Health, and found to be good. In other words, here is a book full of cancer therapies found to be effective at a fairly large percentage rate too, but do you know about them, does your oncologist know about them, does any doctor know about them? No. And I'm afraid that that would be the fate of my method too, if I didn't bring it directly to you, because you care. You have loved ones. And an agency may care politically - but not because they have a loved one dependent on it. I would like very much if you could read Ralph Moss' book. Because if you do, you will read that the NIH does, as a rule, pay attention to such new discoveries (such as vitamins A, C, E, D, and K). And, after several practitioners have promoted a discovery and it’s looking pretty good, they job it out to several clinics that will then test it further. Each of those does a slightly different protocol, but it's a good test and the results for the ones that are in the book are pretty exceptional. Fifty percent less recurrence of cancers! Usually 35% to 50% less! And Vitamin K is even up at the 70% level in preventing metastases or a recurrence - sometimes in animals, sometimes in humans. But, you know that percentages "add" - that's what a percentage means, as long as they are independent of each other. So, if you could get 40% protection from Vitamin A, 50% from Vitamin C, and 10% from Vitamin E you're close to 100%! And, for good measure, if you gave two or three more items you would have a very good preventative and helpful treatment to give to any loved one.

But why doesn't that happen? You see, the answer isn't in the lack of testing by the NIH. There's a glitch or a hole somewhere in the procedure, so that after something has been found good and effective, it then never gets to the oncologist's desk. For an oncologist or any doctor to use something on his or her patients it has to be put on his or her desk, it has to be free of charge, it has to be sample-size, and it has to be complete with warnings and recommendations. And that, of course, should all be done. And then you, the recipient, or your loved one (whoever is sitting in the oncologist's chair), should be given that as an adjunct of treatment, right? So, maybe they have to have surgery right now or something else done clinically right now, but by the time they're taking these extra items they might not have it (cancer) again. But it doesn't happen. And we need to find out why it doesn't happen. There's no point in me pursuing better and better testing at a higher and higher level when its not going to reach the oncologist's desk or your loved ones either.

So, I'm so thankful to see you here today because you are interested and you are going to learn how to do this yourself.