|
THE ROAD TO
HEALTH . . . Using “The Clark Method”
Newsletter by Bonnie O’Sullivan May/June 1998
Number 21 Dear Friend, A
report on Dr. Clark’s incredible legal saga is available from Self
Health Resource Center (800) 873-1663. Ask for the June edition of their
Spring ’98 Price List — it contains the newsletter, “In Geoff s
Words.” Oxycal settled in June 1997 but since then there has been more
litigation, US District Court case 95CV01200R. Filings are available from
the Clerk’s Office in San Diego (940 Front St.) or Robert’s Copy
Center (619) 702-7973 if you are interested. The
Road To Health Membership Directory has grown to over 150 entries. Several
people have let me know they have new friends because of the directory,
and feel it’s priceless. A Conversation/Interview with Dr. Hulda Clark — Part 1 Jan Matthews:
Dr. Clark, could you please tell us little about your background? Dr. Clark:
That is a bit difficult, considering that I have a number of years to a
put my memory through, but thanks for inviting me. I would first of all
say that I come from a hard science background: Physics, Biochemistry, and
Biophysics, which was my final training. And consequently I was interested
in the electronics of the device that I was using and did come to some
conclusion as to how it was functioning and how I could simplify it to
make it available to the public. Jan Matthews:
Could you describe the device you were using? Dr. Clark:
There are two electronic devices actually. One is called the Syncrometer
and the other is called the Zapper. The research that led up to them is
discussed a little in my book The
Cure for All Diseases. The Syncrometer is basically a way of scanning
the body, of seeing into the body electronically and seeing what’s
there. Not only can you see what’s there in the body as a whole, but you
can specify a tissue to see what is in, for instance, your muscles or what
is in your brain, or what is in a specific part of your brain, such as the
medulla, or what is in a specific part of your ear giving you your
tinnitus, and so on. So, it is a device that lets you electronically scan
your own body to find out what is there and what, of course, may be giving
you a problem. Jan Matthews:
How does the Zapper relate? Dr. Clark: The
Zapper was developed because I found with the Syncrometer that each
animal, such as ourselves or a virus or bacteria, has as a band of
frequency that it puts out. It puts out some kind of energy that has a
bandwidth and if you give it a high energy at some frequency inside that
bandwidth, you can kill it. So that was the original discovery and that is
discussed too, in my Diseases book. The original discovery was with a
frequency generator and an A/C signal but the Zapper is not a frequency
generator. We later found that you don’t need to be precise with the
frequency, that you could use a square wave and very little energy from a
source, such as a 9volt battery, and it killed all the parasites and
bacteria and virus that you have that are accessible to the current —
kill them together. Therefore, not requiring that you know what the
frequency is nor do them sequentially. Jan Matthews:
When you say parasites, are you talking about worms, bacteria and viruses? Dr. Clark:
Yes. Jan Matthews:
If I have the flu, will it kill the flu? Dr. Clark:
Yes. You may not succeed, but you can. Many people many times do succeed.
But the flu is complicated, the flu can be a virus or it can be something
else. If you first find out diagnostically, with the Syncrometer, what
your flu is, of course, you stand a much better chance of killing it. Jan Matthews:
Can we actually determine the parasites and the viruses and the bacteria
that are in our body? Dr. Clark:
Yes. Jan Matthews:
And where they are located — using the Syncrometer? Dr. Clark:
Yes. That is the new technology. So, you’re not only searching for
things like mercury or a metabolite like lactic acid — you can include
other living things like a specific worm or the staph bacteria in your
search with the Syncrometer. Jan Matthews:
Why has the medical establishment failed to recognize the cause of so many
of the diseases that we seem to be plagued with these days? Dr. Clark:
I think that they are certainly interested — they are certainly not
disinterested. But, time and money are the main constraints on any
research. The money and time that regular clinical biochemistry and
micro-biology technologies require are prohibited for studying everything
the way we would like to have them studied. It is not possible, using the
old technologies, to go after research problems in numbers the way we need
to now because of the big increase in our health problems. It’s the new
technology that is going to make it possible, the way that I have begun
it. Jan Matthews: So
the key to discovering many of these causes is the Syncrometer? Dr. Clark:
Yes, because in one afternoon you can discover more than you could
discover in a year of doing regular clinical biochemistry. Jan Matthews:
Many dollars are spent in cancer and arthritis research, and money is
certainly being put into these areas to detect or determine what the
causes are, and yet we seem to come up with new ways of treating symptoms
rather than discovering what the root cause is. Why is it that we’re not
getting this insight? Dr. Clark:
There isn’t really enough money to go around. There is also one more
fact — the parties who are going to do the funding have to believe in
the project. There is a component of understanding or belief that goes
with doing research. For instance, as long as you don’t believe that it
is possible that an insect is making you sick, you will not spend your
money on such a project nor give anybody else money on such a project. The
fact that Malaria is brought to you by an insect was very ludicrous at one
time. It could not get research funds. As long as there is a paradigm of
thought in the funding agency that excludes certain biological
explanations for disease they, of course, will never give funding for
those projects. We just have to wait for the personnel in those agencies
that govern the funding to be replaced by individuals who have broader
knowledge and greater insight into the possible cause of disease. Jan Matthews:
So we actually need to open the minds of these people, so they don’t
predetermine the outcome of a particular research project? Dr. Clark:
That’s a pretty big agenda. I don’t think that we can open the minds
of persons who are very well established in their professions. I know
that’s true for me in my profession. We just have to wait for younger
professionals, who have a greater experience, to come along and fill these
shoes. Jan Matthews:
It seems to me that we should make The
Cure for All Diseases required reading for all who begin premed or
medical school. Dr. Clark: Yes,
or if not required reading, given as a reference text in case they get
ill. Jan Matthews:
Oh, yes, when you make it personal it sometimes becomes . . . Dr. Clark:
It goes much faster to your understanding. Jan Matthews:
It seems like chronic, debilitating and fatal diseases are becoming more
prevalent in our society. Cancer is on the increase, as well as arthritis.
More and more people have these diseases. What is causing this? Dr. Clark:
My conjecture is that it is due to the increase in the use of chemicals,
particularly solvents and certain other toxic chemicals. These have
handicapped our immune systems. I would specify the gasoline industry to
be responsible for AIDS — it’s the mixing of the gasoline industry
with the food industry. Now, when I say gasoline industry, I can be more
specific: “Anywhere there is gasoline there is a trace, an ultra trace
of benzene.” The Syncrometer, which is extremely sensitive, detects
benzene wherever there are petroleum products — no matter how cleaned up
they have become for use in human food, for instance, or in human body
products, or in water. This, my conjecture, is very frightening to me —
that the gasoline industry has polluted the biosphere in this way — our
food, our body products, the feed for animals, our water. It has set a
train in motion for reduced immunity. Jan Matthews:
So it’s basically something like Vaseline or some of the lubricants? Dr. Clark:
Yes, exactly! Lipstick! Jan Matthews:
Lip balms? Dr. Clark:
Yes. Jan Matthews:
I notice you talk about bottled water also being contaminated. Dr. Clark:
Yes, contaminated with antiseptic and contaminated with pump oil. The pump
oil is a petroleum product. The antiseptic is another solvent. We are not
so much inundated, yet we are pervasively poisoned by traces of these
items. It is true that while we are healthy and younger we can detoxify
these traces. But, there comes a point when it becomes too much for even
the young and that is certainly true with benzene. It is what I have seen
in all the HIV and AIDS cases that I have seen, which is somewhat over 300
now. In every case, without fail, there was benzene buildup. By benzene
buildup I mean nothing mysterious or something that had to be conjectured.
You simply search for benzene, which is a pure test substance. You search
for it in an organ in the body, or the body as a whole, of the patient. Jan Matthews: I
notice that isopropyl alcohol seems to be pervasive. I read my shampoo
label and I see Propylene Glycol and rubbing alcohol. I see isopropyl
alcohol all over the place and I know you mention it as contaminating soft
drinks, bottled water and this type of thing. I read a material safety
data sheet that listed isopropyl alcohol and it said it was extremely
toxic and to be avoided. It said to go as far as to use face protection
and rubber gloves when using it, and yet I find it as the main ingredient
in many of our cosmetics and apparently it gets into our beverages and
food industry. What is happening here? Dr. Clark:
That is a paradox that is very well stated — just the way you stated it.
Many of the substances that are in our foods and our products are very
toxic if you read the MSDS sheets. Should we then not believe the MSDS
sheets? And why isn’t something done about that, then? Well, those are
two different questions. The MSDS sheets are correct, but its common
knowledge that they might not be stating the case in reference to the way
you are using it. So, even though mercury is very toxic and so on, if you
mix it as an amalgam in your tooth, you won’t drop dead and you won’t
have all these problems. So the public lore, the professional lore, is
that it is not really so toxic as the MSDS sheets say. Jan Matthews:
They say: “There is only a little bit there and it can’t really hurt
you.” Dr. Clark: That’s
right. You don’t see anybody dying, and of course a professional person
would have the confidence of an organization behind them, the ADA, or AMA
or some other professional organization on which they feel they can rely
for information much more than looking at an MSDS sheet. Jan Matthews:
I have a friend in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and I have had
discussions almost to the point of debates with him about mercury. He
basically tells me that the FDA makes no safety claims about the dental
industry and that the FDA doesn’t approve of the use of mercury in
dentistry — but they don’t disapprove of it either! He says: “We
take no stand on it, but be clearly advised that the FDA has strict
guidelines on the disposal of this material and that some day you will
have to reckon with the legal profession on the advisability of including
mercury in dentistry.” Dr. Clark: I
would like to hear Dr. Frank Jerome from Indiana speak to that subject. He
is an expert on that subject, much more than I am. I see the results from
using mercury in your mouth, but I am not an expert on the technical
issues of it. Jan Matthews:
I notice in your revised The Cure
for HIV and AIDS that you go into great detail concerning new views
you have on dentistry. Could you tell us a little about that? Dr. Clark: The
new views are primarily rather negative. We have not apparently found a
replacement tooth material that is safe in itself. Or can be safely glued
to the existing tooth part that you still have in your mouth. Two problems
are created: The first problem is the toxicity of the tooth material
that’s going to replace the missing part of your tooth and the second
problem, which might even be greater, is that there is a crevice left
under the filling which invites bacteria of the Clostridium family. These
are probably the worst members of the bacteria family that we can invite
into ourselves. And they are bacteria that initiate our tumors or if not
actually initiate them, cause them to become aggressive. Jan Matthews:
How do the bacteria actually effect the tumor? I mean, you’re saying
that in our teeth we have the Clostridium bacteria? Dr. Clark:
Yes! Jan Matthews:
And it’s either a cause or an accelerating element in the growth of
tumors? Is that cancerous tumors or non-cancerous tumors, or both? Dr. Clark:
I have clearly distinguished between cancerous and non-cancerous tumors.
But it is the distinction that is somewhat arbitrary in the clinical
sense. Clinically, the distinction is made on the basis of observing the
cytology tissue and that is rather vague. I have removed the vagueness of
the distinction by saying that at a point where a certain stimulator is
produced, at that point, we will call it malignant. That is what I am
using and I think it is by far the best, it’s at least precise, and the
only time that you do have this stimulator produced in your body is when
you have a particular parasite. The stages are found in your organs. These
stages abound in our food and they can easily be found clinically if
somebody were to search about to find them. But, in doing so they have to
believe in what they are searching for, of course. So the distinction
between malignant and non-malignant is precise in my definition, and not
so precise clinically. I would prefer mine, of course. So, before the
tissue becomes malignant it is not malignant. You can say it is benign or
pre-malignant or something much earlier than that even and the Clostridium
bacteria occur at an even earlier time. It is before the tissue has become
malignant but while it is setting up to be malignant. In other words, the
Clostridium is denigrating the DNA for the tumor to become aggressive and
grow even before it is malignant. Jan Matthews:
Is there a way of detecting tumors in an early stage? Dr. Clark:
With the Syncrometer it is quite easy. You simply put a pure sample of DNA
in the circuit and use the Syncrometer the way you’re taught to use it
(in the Syncrometer Class given at the Self Health Resource Center).
Search for it in any one of your tissues. Wherever you find it, you will
find a small abnormal growth. If it’s large enough to see on a scan, of
course, you will see it. And I always recommend doing a scan immediately
if you find DNA in a particular organ because there will be a small
abnormal growth beginning there. You don’t know how far along it is, so
in either case it’s best to have some kind of a picture, a scan or an
ultrasound, of that organ to see if the small abnormal growth is big
enough for you to see. Very often it is. Well over half of the ones we
find can be seen on some kind of Xray picture after we find it
electronically. Jan Matthews: So,
by using the Syncrometer and a DNA sample, you can actually detect breast
tumors, or brain tumors, at a very early stage and then use some sort of
confirming device to actually take a picture of the tumor? Dr. Clark:
Oh, yes, we do it all the time. Sometimes it’s not so early. Very many
tumors are undetected at an early stage because there are no symptoms. The
first symptom of a brain tumor might be having a seizure or being dizzy
and falling down. Or the tumor might already be fairly large. It could be
the size of a pea or the size of a nickel, and you can spot that pretty
easily on a CT (computerized tomography) scan of the brain. At that point
you couldn’t go after it, of course, so this is by far the most
meticulous way to search the body for a tumor. Jan Matthews:
The Syncrometer will actually detect tumors even before they’re
detectable using other means, such as mammograms? Dr. Clark:
To be detectable by other means they pretty much have to be 4 millimeters
at least in size, and most of those get missed. In fact, a lot of brain CT
scans missed tumors that were 5 to 6 or 7 millimeters across. It’s
understandable. There are no particular symptoms and some symptoms, like
memory loss or a change in personality in an elderly person, aren’t
taken so seriously by the medical profession that they would search very
carefully and look for a tumor in the brain. Jan Matthews:
So, once you detect it on the Syncrometer you know that its there and it
can then be searched for more diligently and looked for until its found,
rather than: “I didn’t see it so it must not be there.” Dr. Clark: That’s
right, but, of course, we can get rid of it in one day, so you would need
to jump to attention and get that scan made so you can see it before its
gone. We take the DNA out of it in a day or two. Jan Matthews:
How do you do that? Dr. Clark:
Well you have to know that the DNA is made by the Clostridium bacteria.
And that the Clostridium is coming from two sources and two only: The
intestinal tract and your teeth; the large fillings, especially plastic
fillings, in your teeth. Jan Matthews:
So, by removing the fillings . . . Dr. Clark:
Yes, we take those fillings out, pronto. If possible, the first day or the
second day — even before I see the patient because that’s the
lifesaving feature. That’s where time is so important; we take those out
and we clear the intestinal tract of Clostridium bacteria. Evidentially
the teeth are infecting the intestine — not other way around. Jan Matthews:
How do you get the Clostridium bacteria out of the intestine? Dr. Clark:
We have a supplement which is essentially a stomach supplement: betaine
hydrochloride. It will clear the Clostridium bacteria out of most of the
intestinal tract — it will push them back down all the way to the colon.
A cancer patient ordinarily will have Clostridium bacteria all the way up
from the colon through the stomach and even in the esophagus. And, also,
in whichever organ is involved in having tumors — it is sometimes all
over the body. But, by using betaine hydrochloride to clear it from the
intestinal tract, and removing the teeth with the large fillings (because
the entire tooth is really invaded by the Clostridium) then the
Clostridium goes away by itself. The body has enough immunity to kill the
bacteria that has entered these organs. It just does not have the
wherewithal to kill bacteria in a tooth crevice. Jan Matthews:
So, what you are doing is kind of like killing an ant colony. You are
killing the colony and the few little ants that are still out there in the
body, the immune system can handle itself. Dr. Clark: That’s
right. Jan Matthews:
What you are doing is removing the source of tumor formation. Dr. Clark:
Exactly, and you will see improvement the very next day or two days later
— it happens very quickly — the body is exceedingly swift in
correcting its health problems as soon as you do the right thing. So, the
very same day that you have the extractions of the teeth with large
fillings, the Clostridium is out of your mouth. You still have to treat
with betaine hydrochloride to clear it from the intestinal tract;
otherwise it would be quite slow. We do both together and in two days we
are rid of the DNA no matter where that tumor happens to be growing. Jan Matthews:
And then the body itself will eliminate the tumor? Dr. Clark:
There is more to it than that. The tumor has already undergone quite a few
mutations. Of course, it may or may not have undergone all these
mutations. You just have to study the tumor with the Syncrometer to see
what stage its in and how aggressive it is and what has already happened
to it — what mutations have already occurred. Jan Matthews:
Once we eliminate the Clostridium. Dr. Clark:
We have cut off the supply! Jan Matthews: It’s
the growth of the tumor that we have stopped. Dr. Clark: It’s
the growth that we have stopped, but we cannot shrink the tumor just by
doing that. You may be fortunate and your body may shrink it because it is
now so powerful in some way that we don’t understand yet. But, if you
want to shrink it with reliability you have to go after the rest of the
dozen components of that tumor. A tumor is much more complicated than a
malignancy. The malignancy is a simple invasion of the tumor. It is just
an invasion by a fluke parasite stage, which was assisted by isopropyl
alcohol. It’s quite easy to get rid of that. But the tumor was created
in a complicated way and perhaps you’ve had that for ten or twenty years
already. So its understandable that layer after layer has been added to
that small growing mass in order to make it an aggressive tumor. Jan Matthews:
In the USA and Canada is it legal for licensed medical practitioners to
use these methods to treat diseases? Dr. Clark:
I don’t know the answer to that. I think you would need a medical
attorney. Probably most medical personnel themselves would have only an
off-the-cuff answer and that would not be precise enough. Certainly these
devices could be used in a research setting. Jan Matthews:
They would have to define what they were doing and they would have to
actually explain that this is experimental in nature. Dr. Clark: I
do that, though I am not medical personnel and my profession isn’t
medical. Jan Matthews:
Have any formal clinical tests been conducted that were sanctioned by the
medical establishment? Dr. Clark:
Using my methods? Jan Matthews:
Yes, using the Syncrometer. Dr. Clark:
Not that I know of, but they are probably in the offing in the future. Jan Matthews:
I actually conducted my own test with a patient with terminal colon
cancer. When I first read The Cure
for All Diseases I thought: “This is so believable I have to try
it.” Soon thereafter, I had the privilege of working with a gentleman
named `Norm’ who had been treated elsewhere for six years and came to me
with terminal colon cancer. He had three large tumors on his spine and we
were able to stop the progress of the cancer using the Zapper. I didn’t
have a Syncrometer so I couldn’t tell what was in there. I took your
advice and I did this treatment based on faith. Within twelve weeks this
terminal patient, who was supposed to die in three weeks, was actually
back to work and was pronounced “in remission” by his oncologist. So,
I personally know that this technique works. It was a very exciting
experience and Norm is now looking for other people with the same type of
disorder and is making Zappers for them. One of the questions he has is:
“Now that I’ve cured the cancer, or that I am “in remission,” and
have gotten rid of this life threatening parasite in my body and gotten
rid of the isopropyl alcohol, how must I live the rest of my life? How do
I prevent this from coming back?” Dr. Clark:
That’s the most intelligent question that he could ask. And I am glad
that you brought it up because if he doesn’t avoid isopropyl alcohol in
his lifestyle he is most certain to pick up the same parasite again.
Incidentally, we hear a lot of very, very nice stories like Norm’s and,
of course, that becomes a driving force behind doing more research and
probably behind your motivations too. Jan Matthews: Absolutely! Dr. Clark:
Parasite stages abound in our meat and dairy industry, so there is no way
of completely avoiding it. For that reason I would tell persons like Norm
that we have to be aware that the environment is very conducive to illness
and unless we explore the whole environment and the problems it brings to
us we will never know how to improve it. It will take persons like
yourself to start to use the Syncrometer, keep notes on everything they
do, communicate with each other in their findings, improve each others’
skills, and build the art — at present there is still an art component
to it — because it has not yet been automated. But, of course, it’s in
its infancy and everything has to start in its infancy. I am very glad
persons like yourself have the insight to clear up a very ill person’s
illness and not call it a “spontaneous remission.” Many a clinical
person might have been tempted to call it “chance,” namely a
“spontaneous remission.” It’s something not understood well. This
experience of yours does not fit the pattern of what you might call a
“spontaneous remission,” but that little feature often gets
overlooked. Say you dealt with a person whose chance of recovery was very,
very small. And, therefore, even if he is only one person, changing his
status was very, very unlikely. That anything can do it is very
significant, therefore you don’t throw that aside as “due to
chance.” Statistics, compiled by people like yourself, are needed before
people will realize that they are capable of doing something very
remarkable. Jan Matthews:
I’ve read stories about patients with colon or brain cancer being told
they are terminal by the medical establishment. After reading your book, I
want cancer patients to not worry about being terminal. I want them to
just know the cause of their cancer and how to deal with the cause. Dr. Clark: Yes,
and its very important for people to know that you don’t have to
understand every bit about the technology that you’re using, as long as
you can depend on it and see that it works for you. In the same way, I
don’t have to understand just how the light is produced from a light
bulb in order to use it. Jan Matthews:
All you have to know is where the light switch is. Dr. Clark:
You do want somebody to know, or somebody to be researching that, but you
don’t have to be that person - you may be busy trying to cure people. At
this point, I would like to tell you how very complicated it is to clear
up terminally ill patients and bring them back to health. You have really
taken on three tasks: Getting the malignancy out of them, getting the
tumor to shrink, and bringing them back to health. Those are three
different things. You might have thought that you really had only one
problem, cancer, because they were so intertwined. But in order to cure
the cancer effectively you have to know its main components, otherwise
they will come after you. So, you need to be able to shrink that tumor
reliably, not by chance, so that you can expect it to happen in a certain
time frame. And then, do a CT scan to see that it has happened. Then you
would feel secure that you knew what the perimeters were, governing the
growth of that tumor, so that you could prevent it. Jan Matthews:
Is it true that in Germany there are more than five hundred physicians
that are interested in your methods and are any of them using your methods
in their practice? Dr. Clark:
I have heard that there are a considerable number of professional people
using this method and that there is a growing interest, yes. Jan Matthews:
I noticed that The Cure for All
Diseases has been translated into German and Japanese. Are there plans
to translate the book into any other languages? Dr. Clark:
There are a number of languages already that some of the books have been
translated into. Jan Matthews:
I’d like to shift a little bit and ask about some specific diseases. It
seems that everyone I talk to lately knows someone with Chron’s Disease.
Chron’s Disease is a devastating disease and, especially when a young
person is involved, it effects the other family members almost as much as
the person with the disease. In the October 1997 issue of Newsweek there
was an article about it and other diseases of the colon and intestine. The
author said small perforations could be seen in the wall of the intestine
and that these small perforations allowed bacteria, viruses and other
pathogens to get into the body. One of the speculations was that as the
result of these perforations things like diabetes, cancer, arthritis and
other chronic and devastating diseases occur. Could you comment on that? Dr. Clark:
I saw this happening more than ten years ago when I had a number of cases
of Chron’s disease. You’ll have a large number of parasites growing in
the upper part of the small intestine and it becomes ulcerated. You would
expect that. And, wherever there is ulceration there is traffic through
the wall. So, Salmonella bacteria, especially, are very prevalent here and
other bacteria, and the parasites spread themselves out as much as they
can. And, while the individual is pretty young they cope with it, but
later on they become debilitated. Jan Matthews:
Frequently, sections of the intestine are removed, and because of
scarring, there is restriction in the intestine and this causes pain when
food passes through. If we kill the pathogens and clean up the various
solvents in the body, will the body repair that scarring? Dr. Clark:
I know that Chron’s Disease patients can be corrected in a matter of
weeks and the pain from scarring has had definite improvement. I think you
would have to look at that under a microscope to see how the scar tissue
is doing, but as long as there isn’t any pain with it that’s not my
first concern. I think getting Chron’s patients back to eating normally
and feeling normal and living a normal life would be my first concern
regardless of what the scar tissue is doing Jan Matthews:
I’m currently working with a gentleman in Canada who has had Chron’s
Disease for seven years. One of the problems he has with it is chronic
diarrhea, or at best, loose stool. I read a book by Webster that says
acidophilus bacteria, the good flora in the colon, is beneficial for this
problem. Webster claims there is a method of restoring the good flora in a
matter of weeks by an implant method. He uses human acidophilus to correct
the acidity problem — to get the correct pH — and then he uses wheat
whey, actually eaten or taken in a liquid form, that feeds the flora. Have
you had an experience with anything similar? Dr. Clark:
I have not pursued very diligently the changing of the flora with cultures
because I haven’t been successful. I find it’s a much faster approach
to remove what shouldn’t be there. In other words, cleaning up your
lifestyle and killing your parasites. That changes the body’s functions
so quickly, changes your flora so quickly, that it outweighs the other
approaches, such as taking various bacterial cultures. I tend to emphasize
removal of bad things rather than taking on new good things. I think there
is a better chance of you getting corrected by removing bad things. Jan Matthews:
Another very serious debilitating disease is rheumatoid arthritis. Many
people have this and it is claimed that the immune system is attacking the
person’s own body. In The Cure for
All Diseases you talk about roundworms being present. Is it possible
that the immune system is really attacking roundworms that have been
unidentified by the medical professionals? Dr. Clark:
I think that’s exactly right. Either the immune system is attacking the
bacteria that have become constant in that tissue, or the parasite that
has become a constant part of that tissue. In rheumatoid arthritis you see
a parasite very strongly in addition to bacterial invasion — again
coming from the teeth. It is pretty easy to solve. You just clean up your
teeth. That means removing all infection from your mouth. You have to
remove the source of the infection, which is under the big fillings, and
the bacteria that invade the joints. Jan Matthews:
I notice that the conventional treatment is normally the suppression of
the immune system. That’s playing right into the invader’s hand,
isn’t it? Dr. Clark:
Yes. Jan Matthews: And,
as a result, patients frequently degenerate into a poor quality of life. Dr.
Clark:
Yes. Jan Matthews:
I talked to a gentleman whose wife has had rheumatoid arthritis for ten
years. Her doctor put her on Prednisone ten years ago and now every time
she tries to get off the Prednisone she goes into a coma because her
adrenal glands literally shut down. Is there an effective way of weaning
her off of this serious drug? Dr. Clark:
No. There is not an effective way, but you still have to do it. You must
go very, very slowly and it is a clinical problem getting off a drug like
that, because it could be life threatening. But, once you have your joint
function back to a considerable extent, the body has a resurgence of
coping power some how. And you can — and this is a conjecture — I
think it would be a lot easier to come down off this Prednisone after
having cleared up the disease, the joint disease, than beforehand. So,
that is still a clinical problem. You want to be in a doctor’s hands to
observe you as you are cutting down your dosages. The
End of Part 1 (Part 2 will be included in the July/August 1998 newsletter,
issue #22.) A Success Story Dear Bonnie, I am 79 years old and five years ago I felt was going down hill fast. At that time I couldn’t do my heavy house cleaning, my own gardening or drive my car anymore. My first attempt to reverse where I was heading was to have a colonic. After my first one I felt sick on the way home and vomited. I called the lady who gave me the colonic and she made me a second appointment for the next day. After that one I didn’t throw up until the third day. I called her again and the next day I went back for my third colonic. The colonics helped me a lot and I felt I was on the right track by cleansing my body. Then
I read The Cure for All Cancers
by Dr. Clark and immediately started on the herbal parasite formula and
did a kidney cleanse. After that I did a liver cleanse and was truly
amazed at the amount of stones I eliminated. During the next five liver
cleanses I saw large, medium and small stones come out. Some were green,
others were brown and I even saw blue ones and a yellowish one. I
have lost 30 unwanted pounds over the past five years and my flesh has
taken up the slack as my weight gradually decreased. Recently,
I read your newsletter and began taking Jim Dew’s Panteric Extra caplets
(2 in the morning and 2 in the evening). On the third day of taking them I
had an amazing bowel movement. It felt so strange that I was compelled to
take a look at what came out . . . it was more stones! They were clumped
together and not all separated as they were after a liver cleanse, but
they were definitely the same type of stones. The feeling I had was that
my bowel movement had just slid out of me like it was coming out of a tube
and it literally filled the toilet. Today I feel like a million bucks. I’m back doing all my own housecleaning and gardening and I’m even driving my car again. Thank you, both Dr. Clark and Bonnie, for all the wonderful information you are publishing. Janet,
KY Updates
from Bonnie: Thank you for all the calls and letters I received with your prayers and ideas for helping my daughter, Sandy. (She had a bout of Cat Scratch Disease - her story is the directory.) Sandy is feeling terrific now. She still uses her Rife machine everyday and loves it. By the way, if anyone is interested in more information about Royal R. Rife and his devices please call and ask me to send you the articles I have about `Rife.’ Sandy also has a Chi Machine and says she gets a spurt of energy from using it that’s better than a cup of coffee. I feel the same way — just the fact that I’m still using it every day speaks volumes! I also love the way my back feels all day since I’ve been using it — no ache. Sandy and I are now taking Jim Dew’s Feel Young tablets. Sandy reports that she knows right away if she forgets to take them - her memory is better when she takes them every day. In May I had the best treat I’ve had in a long time. Sandy came from Washington for a weeklong visit. She got right into the spirit of my ongoing health research and joined me in having two tests done. One was a brainwave test and the second was a whole-body scan ... Flexyx
Neurotherapy System (FNS) Flexyx Neurotherapy is a new, advanced form of
biofeedback. It is non-invasive and painless, and requires that a patient
sit comfortably in a chair wearing dark glasses that generate feedback.
There is no conscious learning or need for attention. People suffering the effects of head injury,
extreme stress, anxiety attacks, depression, emotional trauma, attention
deficit disorder, autism, explosive disorders, Alzheimer’s and
fibromyalgia have benefited greatly. Post-stroke deficits have also
improved with FNS. Potential
benefits can be evaluated by a specialized three-hour examination (done in
two separate visits). After the examination you receive a computerized
brainwave map, in color, of your brainwaves. It will show if you have had
a trauma to your brain that you may or may not remember. The trauma(s)
cause abnormal brainwaves, which can cause the above mentioned problems.
FNS treatments can bring the brainwaves back to normal, which usually
corrects the problems. The
treatments are similar to the examination and, depending on the complexity
and duration of your symptoms, can number from only two or three to 30 or
more. At the culmination of therapy, the brain no longer needs the help of
FNS. The
test (or examination) is a treatment in itself and both Sandy and I felt
better after our test. There is a feeling of clarity in your thinking and
you sleep deeper after treatment. I
am scheduled to have a few treatments to clear up two areas of trauma that
I believe happened during my difficult 36-hour birth (over 61 years ago).
Sandy had four large trauma areas that may take longer to clear. (Whiplash
can cause these trauma areas of the brain.) Sandy
is being treated by Steven Rothman (425) 454-4266 in Bellevue, Washington
for her treatments. Dr. Rothman was trained by Len Ochs who trains doctors
from all over the world in FNS. (Insurance often covers FNS treatment.) If
you are interested in FNS, or would like a referral, please write to or
call the office of Len Ochs, Ph.D. at the Center for Neurofunctioning, 106
La Casa Via, Suite 110, Walnut Creek, CA 94598, phone (925) 933-4296. You
may also visit Len’s website at www.flexyx.com. Quantum
Medical Consciousness Interface System (QMCI system) In
San Anselmo, CA (across the Golden Gate Bridge from San Francisco) Sandy
and I and our friend, Bill Gonzales, attended a lecture given by William
J. Cunningham, B.A., C.B.T., R.W.C., from Boulder, Colorado, (303)
494-1478. Mr. Cunningham teaches health practitioners how to use the
Quantum Medical Consciousness Interface System (QMCI system). After
the lecture Sandy and I scheduled ourselves for a whole body evaluation
with Mr. Cunningham and his computerized Electro Dermal Screening device.
It is a computerized Dermatron device (Dr. Clark called her Syncrometer a
Dermatron device in the first edition of The Cure for All Cancers). During
the evaluation we wore Velcro wrist straps, ankle straps and a headband,
which were all connected to the computerized device. It gathers
bio-energetic data from the body via twenty channels then sorts and
prioritizes the information and automatically begins testing your
energetic reactivity to the issues via all twenty channels simultaneously.
This includes scanning the body at acupuncture meridians and using Rife
technology. The device tells you what you are allergic to, what, if any,
toxic substances and/or parasites are in your body (and where they are
located), and which, if any, of your glands are weak. Then, it tells you
which homeopathics, 12
(c) 1998 The Road To Health.. . Using “The Clark Method”
Newsletter, #21, 1547 Palos Verdes, #314, Walnut
Creek, CA 94596 Phone (800) 651-7080 or (925) 932-1293 or Fax (925)
932-4025 www.road-to-health.com nutritionals,
herbs, vitamins, minerals, and glandular remedies are recommended for you. Sandy
was given the information that she has calcification of the arteries in
her brain! She has herbicide toxicity and is allergic coconut! She has a
weak liver and her kidneys are weak. She was told to take magnesium and
avoid eating calcium rich foods, as well as coconut in any form (the
symptoms of eating coconut for her, according to the device, are confusion
and noncomprehension). She was given a homeopathic remedy for cleaning out
her calcified arteries and one for ridding her body of herbicides as well
as homeopathic remedies for her liver and kidneys. My
information was that I am allergic to several foods, including some of my
favorite ones: potatoes, onions, cauliflower and corn. I have several
glands that are weak, but the worst is my pituitary gland (the master
gland). I was happy to see that my thyroid tested in the normal range
[Bill Cunningham said that if a person is taking thyroid supplements (in
my case: T4, T3 and TAT metabolite) the device will show that the thyroid
is okay]. Other weak areas are my pancreas, adrenals and kidneys. The
suggested supplements were for homeopathic remedies to support my
pituitary, adrenals, pancreas and kidneys and it was suggested I go on a
rotation diet. After
being told that my pituitary gland is weak I was delighted to read a book,
Grow Young with HGH by Dr. Ronald Klatz, which was recommended to me by a
friend. After reading it I immediately wanted to go to an anti-aging
doctor for shots of human growth hormone (HGH). (Note: The book is
available in most bookstores in the US: ISBN #0-06-098434-1.) As
luck would have it, before I had a chance to find an anti-aging doctor I
was introduced to an oral spray of a naturally derived HGH called Eden Ghl. I’ve
enclosed a report on HGH. If you would like a free audiotape, The World is
Listening, call my 800 number and request one. Dr. Ronald Klatz is one of
the speakers on the audiotape. In my next newsletter I’ll bring you up
to date on how I’m doing on Eden GhI. I’m
still enjoying my Formula P caplets. After the allergy season was over in
early June I stopped taking them for five days and I had no problem
(during allergy season I would sneeze and have itchy eyes if I didn’t
take at least four PE caplets with each meal). Since then I’ve been able
to follow Dr. Kelley’s advice and stop for five days after taking them
for 10 days. I’m
also enclosing Loren Biser’s After Everything Fails Newsletter, Vol. 4 -
I have to keep referring to it to remind myself of how harmful dairy
products are! In
Dr. Spock’s seventh edition of his world-famous book Baby and Child
Care, issued last month by Pocket Books just weeks after his death at age
94, he recommends an approach to childhood nutrition that confirms that
dairy products are harmful to humans. Spock says, “I no longer recommend
dairy products after the age of 2 years. Other calcium sources offer many
advantages that dairy products do not have.” Throughout its 52-year
history, Baby and Child Care has been the second-best selling book next to
the Bible. The dairy industry must be furious. Love, &XW49 Bonnie Notice:
The Material in this letter is for educational purposes only and is not
intended as a prescription for any illness. A Conversation/Interview with Dr. Hulda Clark — Part 2 Jan Matthews: “Dr. Clark, could you tell us about your recently updated Cure For All Cancers?” Dr. Clark: “Yes, the updated Cure For All Cancers (February 1998) has new information on what causes tumors. It is brief because the book is about the malignancy and the malignancy is the highest priority. To save a life you must quickly get rid of the malignancy. “Then you need to shrink the tumors and stop making tumors grow and that is a different part of the problem. I have outlined that for my readers in the update so that they can take measures to stop their tumors from growing, to start shrinking their tumors, and to not have anymore tumors. “The other part that’s new — and its a big part — is the dental clean up. One has to do much better then I originally thought. In other words, the plastic that I was recommending in the first issue of The Cure For All Cancers, called composite material, I find is full of those very things that cause tumors to grow. They are copper, cobalt, malonic acid and its family, and urethane, which is a very common tumor grower, which was discovered way back in the 1920’s. “Urethane pollutes our plastic teeth and seeps out continuously. It’s part of the plastic industry and pollutes many parts of our environment. “These composites also have an estrogen substance in them and I’m not at all certain that it has anything to do with cancer or tumors but we should not be sucking on an estrogen substance day and night. It’s bad for men and it’s bad for women. We have a lot of women’s problems, a great deal of women’s problems, not the least of which is osteoporosis. We also have a great deal of men’s problems. We should not be sucking on estrogen. “Finally, there is dye. The material used in dentures and partials is often colored pink which is (usually) a very carcinogenic dye. It is extremely carcinogenic, so having that in your mouth as a restoration it’s unthinkable. What you can do about all of this is what I have discussed in the update.” Jan Matthews: “One of the things you mention in the book several times is malonic acid. What is the problem with it? What is the cause? What problem does it present to the body? And how do we get it into our food chain?” Dr. Clark: “This comes as a surprise to a biologist like me — that there should be something in ordinary food that we, as animals, have been eating since time began, and that there should be something rather harmful in it. Of course, there are other chemicals in all foods that are harmful too, but nobody suspected malonic acid to be present in food. Even though analyses have been made of say, orange juice, which go back to the 1920’s, and malonic acid was one of those acids that was found. “Malonic acid is not only found in certain foods but it is an industrial chemical. That’s how all researchers became aware of it at the turn of the century — in 1900. It was already known then that malonic acid, which was being used in all industries at that time, caused inhibition of oxygen; a slowdown of cellular respiration. It was known because experiments had been done on dogs. By 1920 or so, the first great cancer researcher discovered that no matter how you slow down respiration — whether by using an anesthetic or another chemical, it didn’t matter — if you slowed down oxygen use by a living tissue, you could induce tumors. “But nobody ever combined those two facts, even though they worked with them side by side. Cancer researchers worked with malonic acid because it’s the same research you did when you researched oxygen utilization. And you could always see that malonic acid reduced oxygen utilization. So malonic acid was a staple in any biochemist’s experimentation for about fifty years. But, while you could see that malonic acid always slowed down respiration, and while it was known that slowed-down respiration led directly to tumor formation, nobody thought that we, who are infected with tumor formation, might be eating malonic acid — because it’s an industrial chemical — how could we be eating that? “Nobody, certainly not I, in my wildest dreams, would have suspected malonic acid in the food we eat as a possible cause of tumors in humans — spontaneous tumors — the way we get them spontaneously. But there it was! The Syncrometer discovered it. Now, how to explain it. “We found it first wherever there were tapeworm eggs. And for a year I researched that and decided finally that the tapeworm cysticercus stage or an egg stage or some larval stage must be making it — or inducing us to make it right there on sight. “So, first we found that there is malonic acid wherever there is a tapeworm stage. Secondly, we found it in food! That was, of course, mind boggling — how we could be eating our own tumor forming chemicals! It was just too much to believe and yet every tumor that we analyzed, even after the tapeworm stages were gone, still had malonic acid because we were giving patients carrot juice! Even though they complained that they didn’t feel well after drinking it (there are a lot of complaints about carrot juice) we insisted they drink it because of its good nutritional qualities. “Finally we understood the problem. Patients brought the problem to us. After analysis we found it in the common everyday foods that we eat, specifically carrots, tomatoes and several others. Fortunately the list is not very long. “Then we found one more place where you get malonic acid — in your plastic tooth replacements — and from there it seeps into your system day and night. It is a pretty hearty chemical. Its not one that goes away or is easily detoxified — not at all! It consumes all our B-12 and folic acid, and that’s were our vitamin C goes — that’s why we need grams of vitamin C.” Jan Matthews: “Is that why you recommend vitamin C powder on everything — to detoxify mold and get more vitamin C into our body?” Dr. Clark: “It’ll do that too, but the reason we need so much more than the MDR — the commonly accepted small amount of 60 mg. — and we really do need these gigantic amounts, is to detoxify malonic acid derivatives in some organ. “It doesn’t go all over your body; it’s attracted to those organs perhaps that have metal in them because there is a chelating effect of the malonic acid on the metal and vice versa. The dynamics of it need a lot of study, of course, but the bottom line is we should never be eating malonic acid. We should get the malonic acid out of our mouths — stop sucking on it — and of course we should kill our tapeworm stages. We do that with the updated parasite program. Thus we are free of malonic acid in our bodies and the tumor is now free of one of the dozen things that cause a tumor to grow.” Jan Matthews: “Can we test for malonic acid using the Syncrometer?” Dr. Clark: “Oh yes, and its derivatives too. I use four derivatives that I commonly see made in the body. If you eat malonic acid the body changes it into methel melanate. In a healthy person you don’t see that. You don’t see even malonic acid in the tissues of a healthy person. A healthy young child who is eating a carrot will not depict malonic acid in some organ that I am searching. Apparently the body has metabolized it quickly in some other way. I don’t know just how. That needs to be researched. I have a theory in the book, but that’s all it is. “But, once you have sickness — a sick organ somewhere — then that’s not what happens to malonic acid. A different route is taken. Apparently you can no longer metabolize it normally and now your body tries to detoxify it instead. First it makes methelylmalonic acid then it makes maleic acid then maleic anhydride and then D(+)malic acid. These are not ordinarily related chemicals in biochemistry. We are all familiar with these, but it is only with the Syncrometer that I have detected the serial nature formation of these — always in one direction and requiring certain vitamins and that is why we need such large quantities of certain vitamins. And as soon as you stop eating malonic acid, or getting malonic acid in any way, you relieve the tremendous requirement for those vitamins. “For cancer patients the first thing we have to do is remove all the malonic acid and dose them up heavily with those vitamins that they’re very, very short on because of having used up all those vitamins — first in that organ and then in the rest of the body. The rest of the body has tried to supply that organ with B-12, folic acid and vitamin C and in doing so it has become depleted.” Jan Matthews: “So, we definitely need nutritional supplementation of the correct vitamins.” Dr. Clark: “We do need nutritional supplementation, but getting safe ones is another big hurdle.” Jan Matthews: “Can we use our Syncrometer to detect the safeness of nutritional supplements?” Dr. Clark: “Absolutely. That’s the whole idea. You get yourself a Syncrometer and a set of the most common solvents that pollute our supplements. They are manufacturing solvents and antiseptics — used in manufacturing to clean the pumps, the tableter, and the tubing that carries the material as it is pumped along — and to grease or oil things. And when you find a product that is free of those you can take it. When I accept a product I also test for all the heavy metals — about eighty them (not all heavy metals, but toxins too) — that I have mentioned in the book.” Jan Matthews: “Have you ever published a list of brand names or do you not get involved in recognition of safe brands?” Dr. Clark: “We need that service very much. I was hoping that Syncrometer users would eventually make a newsletter for themselves and exchange that information so that a good list could go out to people.” Jan Matthews: “Maybe someone will take the initiative after reading this and go out and fight the good fight. I read in your updated (1997) Cure For AIDS and HIV that you developed a new treatment for ridding the body of Ascaris (roundworm) and tapeworm. Could you elaborate on that for us, please?” Dr. Clark: “Yes. It’s an updated, more thorough parasite-killing program than I had in the original books. I found that a little bit of parasite could easily escape because you are not aware that it is present. But in searching with the Syncrometer for remnants of Ascaris (you can get different slides — the eggs and the different molding stages and so on) you’ll find very often that there is a remnant that did not get killed. In order to kill that remnant of both tapeworm eggs and stages (cyst stages, black cyst stages, cysticercus stages) and remaining Ascaris eggs you need to do a more intense program. I call it a “Mop-Up” Program — a combination of ozonated oil and L-Cysteine. We searched many, many an item trying to find a way to kill the last remaining bits of these two parasites. You might ask why they weren’t killed just with zapping and with the regular amounts of tincture and herbs. There’s a good reason. We found that although you kill the adult worm you have not killed the eggs within the eggs — the eggs were sheltered from both the electricity and the herbs — and they come out after you kill the adult worm and there you are, still left with them. That can go on for three to four weeks, and by then you have new cycles established. So you do have to mop that up right after you kill the adults and do the general parasite-killing program so there is an amount of L-Cysteine and ozonated oil that you need to take that I have in the recipe. Do you want me to elaborate on the recipe?” Jan Matthews: “Yes, please.” Dr. Clark: “We have figured out that it takes approximately two capsules of 500 mg of L-Cysteine taken three times a day along with two or three tablespoons of ozonated oil to “Mop Up.” These items penetrate the stages and even dead carcasses enough to kill the eggs within. But whether you have done it completely depends on monitoring it with your Syncrometer to be sure. This amount gets most of it, but I would like not to miss even one in a hundred so I don’t want to say that this is absolutely the amount to be taken for everyone in every case. I am saying this is quite effective. And I would like the individual to do some monitoring. But, if they don’t have a way to monitor themselves with a Syncrometer they should go on the program in the book where it tells you what to do for three weeks or so (and how to make your own ozonated oil to cut the cost and to be in control of the whole procedure). You can order L-Cysteine from Self Health Resource Center, (800) 873-1663, and I have given other sources in the book.” Jan Matthews: “When you say ‘ozonated oil’ — is this something you can buy or something you make?” Dr. Clark: “You buy an ozonator and some olive oil and a ceramic aerator (or stone) from an animal shop (Aquarium store) and bubble medium sized bubbles of ozone into the olive oil for twenty minutes, and that produces a product that is singularly effective in penetrating the parasites.” Jan Matthews: “Is this more effective than the black walnut tincture and wormwood and clove capsules?” Dr. Clark: “You cannot do without the original recipe — yet. So far, I have not found that you could. I am very keen on reducing costs and streamlining a method and making it more convenient. But not at the expense of anybody’s health or life, so we have to do the parasite program with its tincture and herbs carefully, just the way the recipe says, and also add this “Mop Up” Program, but it is fairly simple.” Jan Matthews: “In your book The Cure for All Diseases there is a one-line mention of Lou Gehrig’s disease. Lou Gehrig’s disease is extremely debilitating and almost always leads to death in two to five years. What have you found as the cause and what is an effective treatment?” Dr. Clark: “I’ve only had three cases of Lou Gehrig’s (where there were symptoms already) and I’ve had a number of cases of ALS and there is some relationship between the two. I’m not sure just what or whether they are identical, but for the Lou Gehrig’s cases there were large parasites, namely adult Fasciolopsis buskii in the brain.” Jan Matthews: “Was that zylenes and toluene at work again?” Dr. Clark: “It was.” Jan Matthews: “Incredible.” Dr. Clark: “It is very similar to Alzheimer’s disease in that respect. It probably is a matter of which part of the brain is being attacked that decides which disease it will become.” Jan Matthews: “What about Parkinson’s disease? Many very famous people like Muhammad Ali and Billy Graham have Parkinson’s disease and it appears that while they can live with it they certainly have their bad days. Is it another parasite disease?” Dr. Clark: “Yes it is. I’ve seen lots of Parkinson’s disease and we can clear it up completely (astonishing as that is) — to where a person can be totally rehabilitated in spite of being on maximum drugs — and can walk normally without drugs. The problem is the same still —parasites in the brain — but there is an exceptionally large accumulation of mercury and thallium as well, and malonic acid and probably bacteria and virus from other parasites in addition, so that the enzymes that make dopamine are inhibited. We can easily see when the enzymes are present, and when they are not. You simply do that with Syncrometer biochemistry, which I call electronic biochemistry. It’s easy to see what is present that is causing the enzymes to become inhibited and remove it, restoring the activity of the enzymes, and the person walks . . . or skips.” Jan Matthews: “In order to remove concentrations of mercury and so forth, do you use chelation?” Dr. Clark: “Nothing is as quick as stopping the use of the source of the mercury. We have tried several different chelating methods and they help somewhat, but they are not nearly as powerful as stopping the use of a product that has the offending substance in it. In the case of Parkinson’s disease you must stop using toilet paper, paper hand-towels, and anything else you use from the paper industry that has mercury in it.” Jan Matthews: “You’re talking about basically a change in lifestyle, aren’t you?” Dr. Clark: “Yes, back to a more primitive style, which was not so heavily polluted with mercury.” Jan Matthews: “Another disease I’ve recently heard about is Paget’s disease of the bone, the result of which is somewhat like that of osteoporosis, are you familiar with this disease?” Dr. Clark: “Yes, but I have not paid attention to a specific classification such as Paget’s disease. Although I’ve had a number of cases involving bone disease I don’t recall them automatically as Paget’s disease cases. I would not approach it in that manner. I would approach it as, what are the parasites for this person, what are the main toxins and solvents for this person, and eradicate those and then see what results we have.” Jan Matthews: “Are parasites involved in osteoporosis? I mean, is this a nutritional problem? I notice that some people absorb calcium more than others do. I think you mentioned, for instance, when you drink milk if you don’t excrete liver bile it’s very difficult to absorb calcium.” Dr. Clark: “Yes, but I think it is largely a dental problem through its toxic effects on the thyroid and parathyroid glands. I have found that the dietary intake of calcium or even vitamin D is not nearly as large a force on your calcium level as how your thyroid and parathyroid glands are doing. So, if you get those two tissues on slides as well as parathyroid hormone and calcitonin and thyroxin as representatives of these organs you’ll find that if there is Clostridium bacteria in your parathyroids, your calcium level drops very, very seriously. And that is probably the basis of the low calcium levels that we see in people’s blood test results. We do blood tests for everyone we see and we’ve probably seen two thousand patients in the last couple of years. Even when patients have no calcium disorder and consider themselves okay in that area (they may be a cancer patient but not concerned with a calcium problem), very often we do see a low level of calcium (something like 8.6 or 8.7 instead of 9.2 or 9.3 — where it should be), and it is always a toxin or bacterium in the parathyroids. It may be malonic acid, Clostridium bacteria, copper, cobalt and vanadium or other metals such as thallium or mercury in the parathyroids.” Jan Matthews: “Does this also effect the activity of the thyroid and the parathyroid? I have heard of people having a hyperactive parathyroid and a hyperactive thyroid. My father has a hyperactive thyroid and the normal procedure for dealing with that is to kill the thyroid gland and then go on medicine the rest of your life. Is this another disease?” Dr. Clark: “It’s another ordinary disease. You’ll find that a thyroid that is hyperactive has metal in it, parasites in it, bacteria in it and probably also virus, though I haven’t pursued that. So, it’s the same kind of situation, and you can often clear it up in a week.” Jan Matthews: “It’s sad that people have these organs removed in order to control it and then for the rest of their lives they have to take some kind of drug to compensate for it.” Dr. Clark: “Well, the future will be better as we begin to understand the real nature of our diseases and begin to do something about it.” Jan Matthews: “When we consider diabetes, there are different types of diabetes: Type 1 and Type 2. I know a case where there is a one-year-old child who is on insulin everyday with severe diabetes. Is it safe to use a Zapper on a one-year-old child?” Dr. Clark: “That is a question that an attorney needs to answer because my experience is not sufficient to safeguard the public. So, I would rather not answer that question because I would have to answer it from my experience.” Jan Matthews: “I understand.” Dr. Clark: “The parent needs to weigh for himself or herself which risks they want to take. They have the circuit in the book. They can build it if they choose.” Jan Matthews: “Yes. In older people, when we look at diabetes, I mean we’ve got parasites and we’ve got toxins involved. Is there any new research in that area that you’ve done? Are there any new insights?” Dr. Clark: “You know, I didn’t need to come up with anything new because the old works perfectly well. The problem is still wood alcohol everywhere in our food and in our body products. We are weighted in wood alcohol. How should we not get pancreatic damage, especially in the young? I have pictures of baby food in the book — it’s laced with wood alcohol — why wouldn’t babies get diabetes?” Jan Matthews: “If we could just clean that out of our environment.” Dr. Clark: “That’s it. And I think that in youngsters the body could kill the parasites by itself if you would only remove the impediment, which is the wood alcohol.” Jan Matthews: “Again the Syncrometer. If the food industry used the Syncrometer on all processes they could actually take care of that problem, couldn’t they?” Dr. Clark: “They certainly could. I hope there will be some responsible manufacturers who take note of that.” Jan Matthews: “Well, maybe someday we will see companies that say: ‘This product is certified free of solvents using the Syncrometer method.’” Dr. Clark: “Yes, and even more precisely, ‘This product has been found free of mercury, thallium, isopropyl alcohol, benzene and so on, up to a certain limit of concentration, using the Syncrometer method.’ That’s the product I would like to buy.” Jan Matthews: “Me too. Hepatitis C is a particularly nasty disease, do you have any experience with that disease?” Dr. Clark: “Oh, yes. I’ve seen quite a few cases of Hepatitis C. It clears up very quickly — in less than three weeks.” Jan Matthews: “Again, is it a parasite disease?” Dr. Clark: “It’s largely dental. The bacteria and toxins from dental restorations have gone to the liver. The liver eventually is unable to cope with it and allows growth of the parasites and other bacteria in the liver and you see all kinds of viruses and bacteria loose in the liver.” Jan Matthews: “Our teeth are such a source of problems!” Dr. Clark: “Yes, I’m afraid that that has become quite a realization.” Jan Matthews: “Dr. Clark, recently a friend of mine told me of a friend who was just diagnosed with pancreatic and liver cancer. It was last week and they’ve given him less than four weeks to live and the doctor said there is nothing they can do to help him. They’ve agreed to give him pain medicine as required toward the end, but they basically advised him to pick out an undertaker.” Dr. Clark: “That is not a particularly difficult kind of cancer to cure with our method. We have had quite a few of these cases and I consider liver cancer, in particular, one of the easier ones to cure. Also pancreatic cancer — provided you have not become debilitated yet, because of the cancer. If you can no longer eat, can no longer pass any food and have become very ill, that adds a complication to the illness that reduces the chances of success, of a cure. If the patient is still able to function, the chances of success for a cure are at least 95%. You just have to jump to it — don’t waste a single day. We would not waste a single hour if we had that patient because we know that things happen that cannot be foreseen. Suddenly digestion is totally cut off or suddenly the valves completely close and then you can no longer correct it. So, as long as the patient is still functioning, jump to it. Kill all the parasites to completion, which means you must include the “Mop Up” Program. Get those infected teeth and teeth with fillings in them out faster than you can count them. Do the dental aftercare program to be very, very careful about getting rid of the infection in the mouth and follow all the other precautions that I give you. It is not that difficult. It’ll be 50% dental, 50% parasites.” The End of Part 2 (Part 3, the final installment, will be in the September/October 1998, #23, newsletter) A Success Story Using The Clark Method Dear Bonnie, August 18, 1998 My father has told me that when I was born I was the ugliest baby he had ever seen. I’ve seen my baby pictures and I agree with him. I was big and fat, cross-eyed, and my skin was covered with an allergic rash. I had a runny nose and was wheezing from day one. ........... I was told that my condition was genetic, that “noses run in my family.” My brothers, father and grandfather all had hayfever at times, but were not nearly as bad off as I was. When I was a child I was always going to doctors. They fixed my “lazy” eye with eye drops, but asthma, rhinitus and food allergies were something that my doctors could never quite cure me of and that I was never able to “outgrow.” I started going to an allergist when I was about eight years old to begin weekly injections of pollen to desensitize myself. I was also prescribed 2 cortisone pills, two antihistamine pills plus four Tedral pills to be taken daily. My bedroom had no furniture other than a bed and an air-purifying machine. With all this my condition did indeed improve, but if I missed my weekly (and subsequent monthly) injections, my resistance quickly dropped to where it had been months before. Also the drugs had adverse side effects: My hands trembled, my mouth was dry and I felt spaced-out. By the time I was in my teens I stopped getting allergy shots and just took medication as needed for hay fever and asthma attacks. I went to the hospital occasionally whenever anaphylaxis occurred from accidentally eating peanuts or fish. About this time I also started to have fainting spells, heart palpitations and seizures. After the doctor put me through all kinds of tests, it was determined that I had hypoglycemia and I was put on a high protein diet. The diet controlled the hypoglycemia fairly well. When I was in my 30’s my hay fever started getting worse again and I went back to see an allergist. After a decade more of allergy shots and lots of medication, I read about Dr. Clark’s book The Cure For All Diseases in an esoteric bookstore. I was expecting the usual snake-oil recipe for health; think happy thoughts, use mind over matter, healing angels and using crystals. All these things I had tried before and got absolutely no benefit. But, much to my surprise Dr. Clark’s book was entirely different. Dr. Clark asserts that all disease (I have trouble with the word “all” — for example, I’m not sure that hemophilia would apply here), is caused by pathogens, parasites or some kind of pollutant. If you can kill the pathogen or parasite and rid the body of the pollutant, good health will be the result. I skipped through the pages to where she described asthma. According to her research all asthma sufferers have Ascaris (roundworm) in the lungs. She also said that seizures can be caused by Ascaris too. Even more incredible was her prescription for killing pathogens by using a “Zapper.” I decided to test her hypothesis on myself and I quickly went to the hardware store and got a 9-volt battery, 2 copper pipes, some wire and alligator clips. That evening I zapped myself using the tapping method she described in her book. I didn’t notice anything while zapping and I felt pretty foolish, but the next day when I woke up I could scarcely believe what a profound difference it had made. My lungs were completely free of any inflammation and my throat was also completely clear. I started singing in the shower that morning and much to my amazement I could go up to high C without any strain. After a lifetime of having difficulty breathing, to be able to take a deep breath without hearing that little whistle or without the usual tightness in my chest seemed too good to be true. Would it last? After about 2 weeks some of my symptoms began to return and I went back to Dr. Clark’s book and read some more about allergies. According to her, a dysfunctional liver caused allergies. To clean up the liver, she prescribes liver flushes — a procedure using Epsom salt, olive oil and grapefruit juice, which has a purgative effect on the liver and everything else in the digestive track. Dr. Clark recommends getting out at least 2,000 gallstones in order to get rid of allergies. I began doing this once a month and after 2 years got out over 3,000 gallstones. About the ninth liver flush I noticed a lot of black strands — probably the sheep liver fluke — that Dr. Clark says most allergy sufferers have in their liver. I suppose I should have confirmed this by taking some of this “effluent” discharge to a laboratory for confirmation, but it was too gruesome to go fishing for it — I wanted to call the FBI to tell them I had something for the X-files. Regardless of what it was, I was happy to get rid of it. The results of all this have been astounding. I haven’t had allergy shots in 2 years. I haven’t used my inhaler in three years. I haven’t had to take any medication for hay fever except for one day this year in August at the height of ragweed season (when usually I had to get a cortisone injection). And the interesting thing was the hay fever I had for that one day disappeared after I zapped — which leads me to think that it was a sinus infection instead of hay fever. I also use the Zapper to get rid of colds and to clear up pimples, which it does very well. I accidentally ate peanut butter about a month ago (a friend had cooked it in with eggplant), and instead of rushing to the hospital with anaphylaxis I had some minor swelling of my mouth and lips and a little heartburn that disappeared in 10 minutes. I was so happy with these results I told all my friends about it and many of them have followed Dr. Clark’s recommendations for various health problems and have gotten results that are just as remarkable as mine. For most serious or persistent conditions it seems necessary to follow all of Dr. Clark’s recommendations. Zapping alone has its limitations. Using the parasite program in conjunction with zapping, liver flushes and kidney cleanses seem to bring the best results. Many skeptics think that Dr. Clark’s methods only work for me because I believe in them. Anecdotal stories such as mine do little to convince the medical community of the validity of Dr. Clark’s findings. To those people, I agree that much more research is needed, especially research with control groups over a long period of time. In the meantime though, I am grateful that Dr. Clark decided to go public with her research. I wouldn’t want to wait another 10 or 20 years to be free from disease. People may think I’m a kook because I periodically electrocute myself. That’s okay! I don’t mind because I’m not selling anything and I don’t need people’s acceptance of this for me to be healthy. They can laugh all they want, but I’m keeping my Zapper! Steve Taylor, CT A Success Story Using The Kelley Method Rachael S., Norcross, GA. August 28, 1998 26-Year Victory Over Cancer |